使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

迪卡 · 2020-05-02 09:46:03

我将VMware的Ubuntu16.04的网络与主机变为桥接模式，
板子的wifi连接家里的路由器，这样，板子就和ubuntu在一个局域网里了。

在ubuntu上打开iperf服务，我的ubuntu的ip是172.16.1.110

# iperf -s

在板子上运行iperf客户端

root@dika-pc:~# iperf -c 172.16.1.110 -t 60

PC端测试结果如下

[  4] local 172.16.1.110 port 5001 connected with 172.16.1.109 port 46440
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]  0.0-60.2 sec  71.6 MBytes  9.97 Mbits/sec

板子端测试结果如下

root@dika-pc:~# iperf -c 172.16.1.110 -t 60
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 172.16.1.110, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 43.8 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local 172.16.1.109 port 46440 connected with 172.16.1.110 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0-60.0 sec  71.6 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec

多测试几遍
基本上就是10Mbps，转换为MB/S就是1.2MB/s

john78 · 2020-05-02 09:51:01

8266是自己的固件？某宝上SPI接口有个看上去很牛，价格也挺牛

ubuntu · 2020-05-02 09:51:09

这速度给力, 不错噢.

迪卡 · 2020-05-02 09:51:31

测试udp
ubuntu主机端

iperf -s -u

板子端

iperf -c 172.16.1.110 -u -t 10 -f M -b 100M

测试完成

[  3] local 172.16.1.109 port 52720 connected with 172.16.1.110 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  13.1 MBytes  1.31 MBytes/sec
[  3] Sent 896 datagrams

速度1.3MB/S

迪卡 · 2020-05-02 09:52:56

8266因为只是小模块，在进行长时间测试时，具有不俗的发热量，手在模块底部放不住，太烫了。
接下来，我换成esp8089试一下，这个底板比较大。

dgtg · 2020-05-02 10:31:36

这个测试好啊，让大家心里基本有个数...

迪卡 · 2020-05-02 10:32:20

换成esp8089不知道咋的了，速度下降了一半还多，可能是因为我把配置的boot脚给扯掉的缘故吧
之前用这个测试wget还能到1MB/s

最近编辑记录迪卡 (2020-05-02 10:33:56)

迪卡 · 2020-05-02 10:35:29

经测试，esp8089的发热量也贼大，那么好吧，我选择使用esp8266ex

迪卡 · 2020-05-02 10:40:05

做个热压力测试

迪卡 · 2020-05-02 11:14:46

[ 4] local 172.16.1.110 port 5001 connected with 172.16.1.109 port 58502
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.91 MBytes 8.31 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 10.0-20.0 sec 10.8 MBytes 9.08 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 20.0-30.0 sec 11.5 MBytes 9.68 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 30.0-40.0 sec 10.7 MBytes 8.98 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 40.0-50.0 sec 10.8 MBytes 9.04 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 50.0-60.0 sec 10.9 MBytes 9.18 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 60.0-70.0 sec 11.7 MBytes 9.80 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 70.0-80.0 sec 11.7 MBytes 9.79 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 80.0-90.0 sec 11.7 MBytes 9.85 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 90.0-100.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.71 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 100.0-110.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.74 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 110.0-120.0 sec 11.7 MBytes 9.82 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 120.0-130.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.76 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 130.0-140.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.76 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 140.0-150.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.73 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 150.0-160.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.70 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 160.0-170.0 sec 11.4 MBytes 9.53 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 170.0-180.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.69 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 180.0-190.0 sec 10.7 MBytes 8.99 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 190.0-200.0 sec 11.7 MBytes 9.83 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 200.0-210.0 sec 11.8 MBytes 9.91 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 210.0-220.0 sec 11.7 MBytes 9.79 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 220.0-230.0 sec 11.7 MBytes 9.78 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 230.0-240.0 sec 11.7 MBytes 9.85 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 240.0-250.0 sec 11.8 MBytes 9.93 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 250.0-260.0 sec 11.7 MBytes 9.81 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 260.0-270.0 sec 11.9 MBytes 9.97 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 270.0-280.0 sec 11.9 MBytes 9.94 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 280.0-290.0 sec 11.8 MBytes 9.86 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 290.0-300.0 sec 11.8 MBytes 9.91 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 300.0-310.0 sec 11.8 MBytes 9.91 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 310.0-320.0 sec 11.9 MBytes 9.94 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 320.0-330.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.72 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 330.0-340.0 sec 10.7 MBytes 8.98 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 340.0-350.0 sec 11.1 MBytes 9.27 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 350.0-360.0 sec 11.7 MBytes 9.78 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 360.0-370.0 sec 11.0 MBytes 9.22 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 370.0-380.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.77 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 380.0-390.0 sec 11.8 MBytes 9.89 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 390.0-400.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.75 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 400.0-410.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.74 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 410.0-420.0 sec 11.8 MBytes 9.86 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 420.0-430.0 sec 11.4 MBytes 9.59 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 430.0-440.0 sec 11.5 MBytes 9.62 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 440.0-450.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.72 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 450.0-460.0 sec 11.6 MBytes 9.76 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 460.0-470.0 sec 9.71 MBytes 8.15 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 470.0-480.0 sec 10.7 MBytes 8.94 Mbits/sec

mango · 2020-05-02 12:04:25

这个结果相当可以了

迪卡 · 2020-05-02 12:13:14

板子与8266连接的测试照片在这里
http://www.dika.ren/

迪卡 · 2020-05-02 13:31:08

累计100多分钟测试

[  5] 6150.0-6160.0 sec  8.01 MBytes  6.72 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6160.0-6170.0 sec  9.01 MBytes  7.56 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6170.0-6180.0 sec  8.76 MBytes  7.35 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6180.0-6190.0 sec  9.32 MBytes  7.82 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6190.0-6200.0 sec  9.35 MBytes  7.84 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6200.0-6210.0 sec  9.19 MBytes  7.71 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6210.0-6220.0 sec  9.87 MBytes  8.28 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6220.0-6230.0 sec  9.18 MBytes  7.70 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6230.0-6240.0 sec  8.94 MBytes  7.50 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6240.0-6250.0 sec  8.79 MBytes  7.37 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6250.0-6260.0 sec  8.11 MBytes  6.81 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6260.0-6270.0 sec  8.71 MBytes  7.31 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6270.0-6280.0 sec  7.77 MBytes  6.52 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6280.0-6290.0 sec  11.6 MBytes  9.74 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6290.0-6300.0 sec  10.7 MBytes  8.98 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6300.0-6310.0 sec  11.5 MBytes  9.63 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6310.0-6320.0 sec  11.4 MBytes  9.56 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6320.0-6330.0 sec  11.0 MBytes  9.22 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6330.0-6340.0 sec  11.6 MBytes  9.75 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6340.0-6350.0 sec  11.6 MBytes  9.75 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6350.0-6360.0 sec  11.5 MBytes  9.62 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6360.0-6370.0 sec  11.5 MBytes  9.66 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6370.0-6380.0 sec  11.6 MBytes  9.75 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6380.0-6390.0 sec  11.5 MBytes  9.68 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6390.0-6400.0 sec  11.5 MBytes  9.65 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6400.0-6410.0 sec  11.6 MBytes  9.73 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6410.0-6420.0 sec  11.6 MBytes  9.75 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6420.0-6430.0 sec  10.9 MBytes  9.15 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6430.0-6440.0 sec  10.6 MBytes  8.88 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6440.0-6450.0 sec  10.2 MBytes  8.60 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6450.0-6460.0 sec  11.0 MBytes  9.25 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6460.0-6470.0 sec  9.50 MBytes  7.97 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6470.0-6480.0 sec  10.9 MBytes  9.14 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6480.0-6490.0 sec  10.1 MBytes  8.44 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6490.0-6500.0 sec  10.2 MBytes  8.56 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6500.0-6510.0 sec  10.1 MBytes  8.44 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6510.0-6520.0 sec  10.5 MBytes  8.83 Mbits/sec
[  5] 6520.0-6530.0 sec  11.5 MBytes  9.65 Mbits/sec

Blueskull · 2020-05-02 14:02:30

感谢分享。本来想用8285做个K210图传的，看来还是ESP32吧。8285主要是图个Sipeed的M1w模块集成，省了个电磁认证的钱。不过转念一想一套CE+FCC也就3w块钱，不值得牺牲分辨率。

kingmooth · 2020-05-04 13:09:11

8266能跑这个速度，666

Chin · 2022-11-01 10:08:15

8266这么强！

WhyCan Forum(哇酷开发者社区)

楼主 #1 2020-05-02 09:46:03 分享评论

使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

#2 2020-05-02 09:51:01 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

#3 2020-05-02 09:51:09 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

楼主 #4 2020-05-02 09:51:31 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

楼主 #5 2020-05-02 09:52:56 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

#6 2020-05-02 10:31:36 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

楼主 #7 2020-05-02 10:32:20 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

楼主 #8 2020-05-02 10:35:29 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

楼主 #9 2020-05-02 10:40:05 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

楼主 #10 2020-05-02 11:14:46 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

#11 2020-05-02 12:04:25 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

楼主 #12 2020-05-02 12:13:14 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

楼主 #13 2020-05-02 13:31:08 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

#14 2020-05-02 14:02:30 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

#15 2020-05-04 13:09:11 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

#16 2022-11-01 10:08:15 分享评论

Re: 使用iperf测试esp8266做F1C200s的spi无线网卡的网络性能(10Mbps)

页脚